PART I
Warm-up
Reconnect with a useful idea before starting state changes with vary. In one or two sentences, describe the input, output or host boundary from the previous exercise that this lesson builds on. If you are arriving directly, skim the worked example first; there is no locked prerequisite.
A rough note is enough. You can revise it after the example.
PART II
Instruction & guided example
Use current state in a following decision
A decision made after an update should read the updated state when that is the intended rule. Tracing the comparison’s input is as important as tracing the addition. A stale parameter can have the right type yet describe the wrong moment.
stockAfterDelivery starts from initial 0, adds delivery 3, then returns stock > 0, predicting true. If it instead returned initial > 0, it would predict false and ignore the delivery. At initial 2 with delivery -2, updated stock is 0 and the correct post-update comparison is false.
The words initial and stock represent different moments after a write. Do not interchange them because both are i32. Also keep the rule narrow: the helper answers whether the final arithmetic value is positive, not whether every update was authorized or stock was persisted.
Worked reasoning and supplied artifact
fnc hasStockAfterDelivery(initial: i32, delivery: i32) -> bool {
vary stock: i32 = initial;
stock += delivery;
return stock > 0;
}Illustrative example from the proposed WillowScript design. The language and WUIX/WMATH/WDB/WAUDIO/WTMP services are not implemented in the supplied source. This site has no interpreter, VM or native host and does not execute or certify the snippet.
Walk through the example, one line at a time
fnc hasStockAfterDelivery(initial: i32, delivery: i32) -> bool {Read the function name, its parameter names/types and the result type after ->. This is the contract the body must satisfy.
vary stock: i32 = initial;Introduce a binding intended to change. Identify its initial value now so later updates can be traced rather than guessed.
stock += delivery;Read the current value, add the right-hand amount and store the new value. A before/after trace makes the state change visible.
return stock > 0;Evaluate the following expression using the current values, then send its result to the caller. Explain the value; do not confuse it with printed output.
}Close the nested block or value begun earlier. Match it to its opening boundary to keep the structure readable.
Try the guided change
Trace (0,3) and (2,-2), then contrast the final comparison with one incorrectly using initial.
- Write the supplied inputs and initial state before following the example.
- Reconstruct each intermediate calculation or host decision, then compare with the worked artifact.
- Explain why the contrasting alternative fails before attempting the changed inputs in Part IV.
PART III
Take a breather
Step back after the guided example. Look away from the screen, stretch, or reread your prediction. This is an optional learning pause, not a timer or an assessment gate.
When you return, try to name the lesson’s key idea without copying its wording. If that feels difficult, return to Part II and trace one line rather than restarting the entire lesson.
PART IV
Independent practice
Project context: Workshop stock counter. Build a small, understandable change around state changes with vary.
Build a helper that adds a signed reward adjustment to initial points and returns whether the new total is positive. Choose one case that flips false to true and one that flips true to false.
What to produce
Two state-plus-decision traces, such as 0+5 → 5 → true and 3-3 → 0 → false, with the comparison input named.
- State the intended behavior in a sentence before editing.
- Use only source-backed syntax and the host services whose contract you have been given.
- Record a normal case and a boundary or unavailable-resource case.
- Label hand predictions separately from anything actually measured in a supplied toolchain.
Syntax colors are a reading aid, not a compiler. The line you are editing stays uncolored until you move to a different line; capitalization is never changed. Drafts stay on this browser and code is not executed.
Need a hint?
stockAfterDelivery starts from initial 0, adds delivery 3, then returns stock > 0, predicting true. If it instead returned initial > 0, it would predict false and ignore the delivery. At initial 2 with delivery -2, updated stock is 0 and the correct post-update comparison is false.
The words initial and stock represent different moments after a write. Do not interchange them because both are i32. Also keep the rule narrow: the helper answers whether the final arithmetic value is positive, not whether every update was authorized or stock was persisted.
Original learning-path task and reference
In a museum exhibit console, demonstrate state changes with vary. Integrate this section with the preceding section’s artifact; identify inputs, outputs, and host capabilities. Include .ws source and a host-resource contract; compare at least one normal case and one edge case.
fnc total() -> i32 {
vary count: i32 = 1;
const bonus: i32 = 2;
count += bonus;
return count;
}Where the original task needs a host API that is not supplied here, write the contract and predictions. Do not invent a runtime result.
PART V
Self-check
Use this check to notice what to revisit. It does not award a private course grade, block another page or claim to verify compiled code. Every answer has a learning explanation.
You may keep exploring even if you are unsure. Use the hint, compare the trace, and revise your explanation.
PART VI
Recap & small task
Bring the idea back to the mod feature you are building. A useful recap connects the mechanism to a decision you can make in your own code.
- Use current state in a following decision
- A decision made after an update should read the updated state when that is the intended rule. Tracing the comparison’s input is as important as tracing the addition. A stale parameter can have the right type yet describe the wrong moment.
- Separate source-backed behavior, host requirements and untested predictions.
One small recap task
Write one case that exposes mistakenly comparing the initial value.
This marks your personal practice record only. It is not a certification or an official workspace assessment.
