PART I
Warm-up
Reconnect with a useful idea before starting propose a host-neutral application contract. In one or two sentences, describe the input, output or host boundary from the previous exercise that this lesson builds on. If you are arriving directly, skim the worked example first; there is no locked prerequisite.
A rough note is enough. You can revise it after the example.
PART II
Instruction & guided example
Connect readiness to the first service request carefully
A host-neutral application contract describes user goals, supplied data, services, permissions, lifetime and evidence before choosing environment-specific integrations. The source’s Application constructor and app.ready callback are illustrative host inputs, not builtins supplied by this school. A Willow learner can reuse precise state reasoning while keeping proposed .ws and conceptual native services distinct from implemented .w.
A future planner wants to read inventory after app.ready. Sample lifecycle map: application configured → host reports readiness according to its contract → callback requests inventory → permission and availability checks still apply. Readiness may mean the window exists; it must not be assumed to mean every data service is authorized and ready unless the host says so.
The original callback only requests console.log("Ready"). Expanding it into inventory work changes the service contract. Do not infer ordering, concurrency or cancellation signatures from the existence of the event key. List the exact readiness guarantee needed by the first request.
Worked reasoning and supplied artifact
// Worked contract artifact:
// A future planner wants to read inventory after app.ready. Sample lifecycle map: application configured → host reports readiness according to its contract → callback requests inventory → permission and availability checks still apply. Readiness may mean the window exists; it must not be assumed to mean every data service is authorized and ready unless the host says so.Illustrative example from the proposed WillowScript design. The language and WUIX/WMATH/WDB/WAUDIO/WTMP services are not implemented in the supplied source. This site has no interpreter, VM or native host and does not execute or certify the snippet.
Walk through the example, one line at a time
// Worked contract artifact:This comment explains intent for a reader. It is not an operation and should not be counted as an executed result.
// A future planner wants to read inventory after app.ready. Sample lifecycle map: application configured → host reports readiness according to its contract → callback requests inventory → permission and availability checks still apply. Readiness may mean the window exists; it must not be assumed to mean every data service is authorized and ready unless the host says so.This comment explains intent for a reader. It is not an operation and should not be counted as an executed result.
Try the guided change
Compare the original logging callback responsibility with the proposed inventory-start responsibility.
- Write the supplied inputs and initial state before following the example.
- Reconstruct each intermediate calculation or host decision, then compare with the worked artifact.
- Explain why the contrasting alternative fails before attempting the changed inputs in Part IV.
PART III
Take a breather
Step back after the guided example. Look away from the screen, stretch, or reread your prediction. This is an optional learning pause, not a timer or an assessment gate.
When you return, try to name the lesson’s key idea without copying its wording. If that feels difficult, return to Part II and trace one line rather than restarting the entire lesson.
PART IV
Independent practice
Project context: Independent WillowScript application. Build a small, understandable change around propose a host-neutral application contract.
Plan a schedule viewer that starts a read after readiness. State the required readiness condition, separate read authorization and the desired outcome if data remains unavailable.
What to produce
A readiness/service dependency diagram and explicit guarantees needed at each boundary.
- State the intended behavior in a sentence before editing.
- Use only source-backed syntax and the host services whose contract you have been given.
- Record a normal case and a boundary or unavailable-resource case.
- Label hand predictions separately from anything actually measured in a supplied toolchain.
Syntax colors are a reading aid, not a compiler. The line you are editing stays uncolored until you move to a different line; capitalization is never changed. Drafts stay on this browser and code is not executed.
Need a hint?
A future planner wants to read inventory after app.ready. Sample lifecycle map: application configured → host reports readiness according to its contract → callback requests inventory → permission and availability checks still apply. Readiness may mean the window exists; it must not be assumed to mean every data service is authorized and ready unless the host says so.
The original callback only requests console.log("Ready"). Expanding it into inventory work changes the service contract. Do not infer ordering, concurrency or cancellation signatures from the existence of the event key. List the exact readiness guarantee needed by the first request.
Original learning-path task and reference
Use your Willow knowledge to implement the .ws host integration, explaining which work remains native and which belongs in the script. In a museum exhibit console, demonstrate propose a host-neutral application contract. Integrate this section with the preceding section’s artifact; identify inputs, outputs, and host capabilities. Include .ws source and a host-resource contract; compare at least one normal case and one edge case.
import wuix.widget;
import app;
domain Workspace {
const application = Application({
name: "Workspace",
window: { title: "Dashboard", size: [1280, 800] },
events: {
"app.ready": fnc() -> void { console.log("Ready"); }
}
});
}Where the original task needs a host API that is not supplied here, write the contract and predictions. Do not invent a runtime result.
PART V
Self-check
Use this check to notice what to revisit. It does not award a private course grade, block another page or claim to verify compiled code. Every answer has a learning explanation.
You may keep exploring even if you are unsure. Use the hint, compare the trace, and revise your explanation.
PART VI
Recap & small task
Bring the idea back to the mod feature you are building. A useful recap connects the mechanism to a decision you can make in your own code.
- Connect readiness to the first service request carefully
- Compare the original logging callback responsibility with the proposed inventory-start responsibility.
- Separate source-backed behavior, host requirements and untested predictions.
One small recap task
Compare the original logging callback responsibility with the proposed inventory-start responsibility.
This marks your personal practice record only. It is not a certification or an official workspace assessment.
