Casilian StudiosCASILIANMODDING SCHOOL

WillowScript (.ws) is a proposed, not-yet-implemented language. Examples and library integrations here are illustrative design exercises, not verified runnable programs.

WillowScript Professional · Review large-text behavior as a separate dimension

Plan DPI and text-layout tests — Review and demonstrate

Plan DPI and text-layout tests: review and demonstrate.

Practice saves only on this browser.

PART I

Warm-up

Reconnect with a useful idea before starting plan dpi and text-layout tests. In one or two sentences, describe the input, output or host boundary from the previous exercise that this lesson builds on. If you are arriving directly, skim the worked example first; there is no locked prerequisite.

A rough note is enough. You can revise it after the example.

PART II

Instruction & guided example

Review large-text behavior as a separate dimension

DPI and text layout need explicit unit and measurement contracts. A logical layout size differs from physical pixels, and glyph measurements differ across fonts, scales and languages. Use small numeric budgets for predictions and native observations for actual rendering; no WUIX engine runs on this school site.

Host text-size preference scales glyph metrics independently of DPI. Base text width80 logical units; large-text factor1.5 gives120. Control content width100. DPI scale2 applies afterward to both.

Worked reasoning: Base width80 fits100. Large text120 overflows by20 logical units, or40 physical pixels at scale2. Doubling DPI alone does not solve the logical fit because both box and text scale together.

Failed alternative: Treating high-DPI testing as equivalent to large-text testing misses an independent accessibility input.

Worked reasoning and supplied artifact

Base:80 logical text vs100 logical box ->fit
Large:120 vs100 ->overflow20 logical
At DPI2:text240px vsbox200px ->overflow40px
Dimensions:DPI and text preference independent

Illustrative example from the proposed WillowScript design. The language and WUIX/WMATH/WDB/WAUDIO/WTMP services are not implemented in the supplied source. This site has no interpreter, VM or native host and does not execute or certify the snippet.

Walk through the example, one line at a time
  1. Base:80 logical text vs100 logical box ->fit

    Read this key/value within its containing object. State which parent owns it and the narrow visible behavior it configures.

  2. Large:120 vs100 ->overflow20 logical

    Read this key/value within its containing object. State which parent owns it and the narrow visible behavior it configures.

  3. At DPI2:text240px vsbox200px ->overflow40px

    Read this key/value within its containing object. State which parent owns it and the narrow visible behavior it configures.

  4. Dimensions:DPI and text preference independent

    Read this key/value within its containing object. State which parent owns it and the narrow visible behavior it configures.

Try the guided change

Reconstruct the supplied worked case first: list its inputs, intermediate decisions and final artifact. Compare each row with the explanation and identify exactly where the rejected alternative fails. Then use the changed inputs in Part IV for independent work.

  • Write the supplied inputs and initial state before following the example.
  • Reconstruct each intermediate calculation or host decision, then compare with the worked artifact.
  • Explain why the contrasting alternative fails before attempting the changed inputs in Part IV.

PART III

Take a breather

Step back after the guided example. Look away from the screen, stretch, or reread your prediction. This is an optional learning pause, not a timer or an assessment gate.

When you return, try to name the lesson’s key idea without copying its wording. If that feels difficult, return to Part II and trace one line rather than restarting the entire lesson.

Your drafts remain here. Continue whenever you are ready.

PART IV

Independent practice

Project context: Accessible service console. Build a small, understandable change around plan dpi and text-layout tests.

Analyze base text60, large factor1.4, box80, DPI1.5. Compute logical and physical overflow separately.

What to produce

A two-dimension DPI/text-preference matrix and overflow calculation.

  • State the intended behavior in a sentence before editing.
  • Use only source-backed syntax and the host services whose contract you have been given.
  • Record a normal case and a boundary or unavailable-resource case.
  • Label hand predictions separately from anything actually measured in a supplied toolchain.

Syntax colors are a reading aid, not a compiler. The line you are editing stays uncolored until you move to a different line; capitalization is never changed. Drafts stay on this browser and code is not executed.

Need a hint?

The large-text factor changes the logical ratio; DPI conversion preserves that ratio.

Treating high-DPI testing as equivalent to large-text testing misses an independent accessibility input.

Original learning-path task and reference

In a rhythm-game audio editor, demonstrate plan dpi and text-layout tests. Submit source, acceptance cases, and an explanation proving the section objective. Include .ws source and a host-resource contract; compare at least one normal case and one edge case.

import wuix.widget.button;
import wuix.layout;
domain Login {
    const screen = {
        layout: { type: "column", padding: [24, 32], gap: 16 },
        components: [{ type: "text", value: "Welcome back" }]
    };
    fnc show() -> void {
        wuix.mount("main", screen);
    }
}

Where the original task needs a host API that is not supplied here, write the contract and predictions. Do not invent a runtime result.

PART V

Self-check

Use this check to notice what to revisit. It does not award a private course grade, block another page or claim to verify compiled code. Every answer has a learning explanation.

Can changing DPI alone remove this logical overflow?

You may keep exploring even if you are unsure. Use the hint, compare the trace, and revise your explanation.

PART VI

Recap & small task

Bring the idea back to the mod feature you are building. A useful recap connects the mechanism to a decision you can make in your own code.

  • Review large-text behavior as a separate dimension
  • Analyze base text60, large factor1.4, box80, DPI1.5. Compute logical and physical overflow separately.
  • Separate source-backed behavior, host requirements and untested predictions.

One small recap task

Test text preference separately from pixel density.

This marks your personal practice record only. It is not a certification or an official workspace assessment.

Your practice, on this browser

No public account is created. Drafts and lesson progress stay in this browser’s local storage. They do not automatically follow you to another device and can be lost if browser storage is cleared.

Export a private progress file to keep a copy, then import it on another browser when you want to move your work. Treat that file as your own writing; it can contain your practice drafts.